Admin Complaint (Trojan_Coyote)

[kevinz000]

i'm deciding whether to even humor this wall of text that reminds me oh so well of someone on tg named fwoosh.

---

So, are you complaining I'm not forcing secret MORE, or...? I'm still very confused as to the point of this complaint.

This server caters to players that play Extended. ERP is far more free and there are a bunch of people that will ERP as heads because they know that during extended rounds it's allowed. I would much rather have interesting admin events on Hipop Extended than have it be forced secret, because it would be engaging in a way that isn't "do or die". The vote is a measure to switch it to secret during those rare times when people want secret without having to bug admins. Don't throw the "but there's an RP server you can go to if you really want Extended". This isn't about that. See below for a proposal that would better suit Citadel if this is going to remain the admin stance. Citadel is not Bay or Aurora. Secret rounds are not extended with traitors that try to entice you into a private meeting or visitors that might turn violent if left uncontained - they are in most cases combat clusterfucks, a drastic change in pace from the slow march of time during Extended. 
Well no shit. Unfortunately for you, there is admin policy that allows us to change it to secret in highpop if we want to. They are not combat clusterfucks and you don't know what a real combat clusterfuck is because you've never or almost never been in one. They are by definition more chaotic than extended due to antagonists but they are not combat clusterfucks.

okay now that i have read this i think you're just ridiculous

---

this, your replies, your attitude, etc etc. this is ridiculous and you are ridiculous.

Kev, I made it no secret I think the same thing about your insistence to shove reworks down the server whose main selling point over the past two years has more or less been "regular tg but with vore and erp".
It wasn't and never will be just tg with vore and erp.
Change is not always good.
Stagnation isn't either.
Ports were accepted because they brought Citadel inline with TG and people wanted that. Why was there an entirely new combat system pushed so hard without (from what I've seen on the server and forums - I don't watch the discord) a single highly-advertized public vote for whether or not we like it? Because it would be killed mercilessly, that's why.
We accept constructive feedback about the system and you are free to comment about it in dev discussion on discord which you don't ever do so whatever.

EDIT: There could have been a player poll on the subject. Have it floating around for a week instead of just testmerging it until it felt right-ish and then merging fully. Why do I lose stamina by riding a borg with the wrong button pressed. Why don't I lose stamina if somebody pulling me along is sprinting, even if I'm not. This was shoehorned in from all directions.
This is the first I've heard of the bug and it shows me how ridiculously entitled you are if you think we are to know about every bug before anyone tells us about it. Make a fucking bug report for once in your life instead of pulling that up as a point when none of us even knwo about it.

Righto. I normally ignore complaints I don't have a vested interest in, but even I have to agree that this complaint is kind've ridiculous.

Here's how things currently stand. Correct me if I'm wrong about any of these assertions:

Staff policy, approved both in general and by the hosts of the server, is to force secret when the server population is above a certain threshold (40+ was mentioned below.) There is a valid, objective reason for this: There are members of the server who will toe the line on extended rounds, and borderline self-antag out of boredom. It's more than a handful, and the chaos of extended rounds increases with population. Above this threshold, it is more convenient for both staff and players to force secret rounds. 
With headmin/host permission, if you're going to try to argue this point, I'd be happy to pull up data on the number of "griff/valid/etc." ahelps we get on secret rounds vs extended rounds. One is much, much higher because with a higher population comes more bored shitstains who'll toe the rulebreak line out of boredom.

And no, the argument "well, punish the line-toers then" is NOT a solution, because the vast majority of the playerbase gets upset whenever any staff member makes a ruling that isn't explicitly stated in the rules. Force secret when it's over 40 people, a standard that's been held for several years and enforced by staff? It gets complaints because it's not specifically in the rules, and is "removing player agency". Punishing clowns, assistants, and idiot botanists for causing chaos despite technically not griefing or self-antagging? You bet your ass a lot of people would flock to the forums to scream their heads off about it.

That's not even an assertion. That's all just a basic fact.


This is indeed a removal of player agency. The few are forcing a gamemode for the benefit of the many, because the alternative is a much more chaotic round with a lot more upset, salty people than if we just sent in nuke ops and called it a day.

I understand your concerns. But this was the best decision possible- the alternatives leave a lot more people upset than just "we got stuck with secret again muh RP might get wrecked".

EDIT: The number 40 is arbitrary. There's no calculation based on Seldon's psychohistory
What the fuck no. What are you on about? We need a psychologist to choose our numbers?
 that says 40 is the right number, and not 41 or 39. It was chosen because it's a round-looking number that 'seems about right'.
Well welcome to ss13, buddy. 
That's the easiest way to reason such an arbitrary policy as being correct and hand-wave away all those finicky variables that come to light when you're dealing with people and not machines.
Oh trust me, there was consideration on the matter, far more consideration than you can see anyways.

Our interests diverge, Girdo. My main goal in game administration is not to enforce law or peace or other abstract concepts that can be twisted all too easily.
Your goal in administration is not necessarily the same as ours.
It's to maximize the amount of fun. Borderline self-antagging only becomes a problem when it starts to fuck with other people's enjoyment of the round. "Your liberties end where my rights begin" puts my stance on this in simple terms.
Unfortunately your definition of fun is not the same as ours.

All in all, my test for whether something is not an IC issue has three conditions and the Antag Shield:

• Is it reasonable for a spaceman to do in this situation what the perp did ICly?
• Would most people behave the same way given their metaknowledge of the game's mechanics?
• Has everybody who participated enjoyed the situation once it was over?
• Is the perp an antag or otherwise protected from OOC consequences to IC actions.
  You're not the authority on what is or is not an IC issue.

If any of these are true, then it should be kept IC. For example, stealing the hand telly during a round of extended might not be reasonable for a spaceman to do, nor would most players do it. However, nobody would actually be involved in the theft except the person who did it. Security should respond, not admins. Yes, yes, this sounds like stealing the spare would be okay too. However, in the case of the spare it could be argued that in granting access to every area on the station, it involves every single person working or inhabiting those parts. Ditto with any Door Remote or Command Headset (outside the character's department), but not the NAD, Cap's Saber or the hand teleporter. Messing around with RP is also fine - there's nothing saying your character isn't slightly obnoxious and doesn't know when to leave. ERP is specifically protected under the rules here so I'm not going to breach the topic, but in most cases, slipping or stealing something off a person is an IC issue as well.
Context is everything. There is never "just stealing something", they should have a reason for doing so, however minor.

Extended rounds are not meant to be peaceful rounds - after all, they have increased event spawns - but instead are meant to be rounds where character interactions cause conflict, and even combat. The events are there to nudge that forward. Outside of outright sabotage or griefing, letting it play out (with all the grudges, meta or otherwise, forming) makes for an overall more interesting round. The more people there are, the more possibilities there are. Interfering with something that's not (seemingly) mean-spirited goes against my principles, and forcing secret on highpop turns interesting rounds into boring combat rounds.
Yes they are and what is your point here? Secret is not just a boring combat round unless you roll ops or something which is a gamemode by the way and is not boring.

It's a basic fact that people will complain when the letter of the law is not followed, be it to someone's benefit or to their hindrance. However, at the same time there are even some admins that haven't read the rules through and through. On the page currently pointed to by the server's rules button, it says that the CoC order of succession is a guideline, not an absolute (under the image of the CoC) - nevertheless during one round (Kate Walker got headbanned that round if you want to search it up), one of the admins in guise as a CC Agent absolutely told me that no, HoP is the absolute first in line to the Acting Captaincy and the heads have no say in it, except to depose after the promotion is done. Admins disagree on things all the time - I don't recall who was involved but someone got dronebanned for building a borg chassis (but not the whole thing) as drone, when in previous rounds they were informed by an admin that it was allowed. The letter of the law exists so that anyone can point at it and say "this is what it says, you may have forgotten." This is why precedent exists in the courts system - once one judge judges a sticky case and rules on it, the others can just say "oh, the other guy was set free after doing it, I should be too." Similarly, if an admin rules on something outside of the rules, it should be immediately added to the rulebook. So that the next time it happens nobody can whine.
Things are decided on a case by case basis and while very large discrepencies are frusturating for players you are asking too much if you want every admin conversation to breach a new topic added to the rules and referred to. The rules are long enough, they don't need to be a textbook.

Finally, to your 'the few are forcing a gamemode for the benefit of the many'. The most significant factor for why there are more ahelps during extended than secret is simple: people go into extended with a different mindset to secret. There's only one way to prevent that metaknowledge and that's to keep the results of the gamemode vote secret as well. Not temporarily secret until the round starts, then revealing it. I mean permanently secret - a 'veiled' gamemode that behaves identically to the one chosen in the vote, but is unknown to players. During extended, I'll complain to someone about someone doing bullshit. During secret, I'll save my breath and beat the crap out of them. This is an undeniable fact of knowing the gamemode, nobody is going to act the same between them, and it's the reason people occasionally ask 'what's the gamemode' in OOC. Because it matters. The only benefit the server really has from forcing extended is that admins don't have to hear "bwoink" as often.
Metaknowledge helping your character aside, what is your point here? 

All that having been said, I'd love to have a sample of the ahelps that come in during extended so we can discuss this topic further, but this will have to suffice.
No.

Finally, an idea and a half for solving this in a clean and elegant fashion: Instead of the vote being an absolute with a declared winner and loser based on the number of votes, have it be RNG based, with the vote balance influencing which gamemode is more likely to be selected. 20% Secret, 80% Extended? Same odds for the gamemode. It'll get people whining, but as stated three paragraphs up, you can say "this is an objective and unbiased way to decide gamemode" and get it over with. As noted earlier, the results of the vote and the gamemode itself do not have to be published, to kill off the gamemode mentalities.
You are trying to have the vote changed in an admin complaint..? What is even the purpose of this complaint? To try to explain your own personal morals and idea of right and wrong or to complain about an admin abusing their power, which clearly isn't the case here?

Anything is better than getting hand grease into the inner machinations of the server, and the playerbase's mob mentality in the process. And nothing is worse than an arbitrary decision (in this case, 40) dictating a policy.
Sorry that we try to improve the server. I can't speak for the secret/extended round forcing policy but it seems to work out fine until someone whines because it was used to justify 2 rounds of secret when the admin can as said before force every round above 40 to secret.

tl;dr: Invalid complaint, I don't know what you're trying to accomplish here, rant about your own morals/values/judgement like you're the absolute balance of right and wrong on game design, balance, and player handling/whatnot, try to get an admin yelled at for something that is fully allowed of them at the time of this thread, try to get the vote changed without even stepping foot on official development channels, or what. Because so far, what you will accomplish is absolutely nothing.

---

Also you saying that this is just TG with erp and vore speaks loads about how much you truly understand about the spirit of the server and its playerbase.

[cebutris]

Admin Policy: 
My own statement on the matter:

[Leon_Leonardo]

This was already settled right after it happened and it was made sure that everyone's been informed on how they should properly set the game mode. Due to miscommunication the round type was changed after the round had already started, which isn't how it should be done. That was a mistake and nothing more.

Also to reiterate, admins have the right to set the round type before it's started; vote or no vote. There are reasons to force secret and extended and every admin is expected to use their better judgement when deciding.

Closing this thread now.