Admin Complaint: Poojawa

[Soudesuka]

BYOND Name of complaint against: Poojawa

Your BYOND name: Soudesuka

Date of issue and round ID: Numerous, notably the round a perma was applied over a single OOC namecall of a popular player.

Reason for complaint: Hostile in adminPMs, moderates based on grudges and cliques, barely is active, bans without valid reasons, had one ban overturned by other admins for being unreasonably escalated and on false grounds, power tripping, and abusing powers they shouldn't have been given in the first place as a developer.

[deathride58]

Are you aware of the kind of message that a denied permaban appeal is supposed to send to you, someone that is known to be quite troublesome to staff and the community alike?

Also, are you using Internet Explorer, have you been smoking tonight, or what? Because if this were a legitimate complaint, it would've been posted a long time ago. With how late this complaint is, (After two separate permabans from two completely different admins!) it's clear that it was posted solely to start drama.

You also failed to provide any sort of proof or evidence with your claims, so they have zero backing whatsoever. If Poojawa really was as aggressive as you make them out to be, you'd have *mountains* of evidence to back it up.

Judging from your general behavior and how you shittalked Poojawa when another admin pointed you right towards the door, it's clear that you just have a hateboner for Poojawa in particular, which makes your complaints here seem like you're just projecting yourself onto them.

Honestly? Just go and stay go, for the sake of everyone's sanity.

[Soudesuka]

Please direct me to the publicly available logs and ban logs that aren't there due to a lack of server transparency. "Proof of evidence."

A separate thread should probably be made to point out that glaring flaw in Cit's admin policy.

Real quality you think we will argue with ad hominem, btw.

[Kenzie]

lol denied

[cebutris]

"Hostile in adminPMs", unfortunatley unless you saved round IDs or logs of that, there's not much proof of this happening

"moderates based on grudges and cliques", ditto

"barely is active" if that were a qualifier for someone to be deadmined, then we wouldn't have half our staff, headmin included

"bans without valid reasons", evidence?

"had one ban overturned by other admins for being unreasonably escalated and on false grounds", wow, as it turns out, people make mistakes sometimes. And still, you don't give any evidence of this, either.

"power tripping" again, no evidence

", and abusing powers they shouldn't have been given in the first place as a developer." well gee it's a good thing they were given to them as an admin, not as a developer.


In general you make a lot of accusations here and don't have a single screenshot, not even a single round ID to back up your claims. The burden of proof lies in the accuser, and you have provided exactly none.